Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Amyloid imaging and prediction of conversion to Alzheimer's disease

From: Amyloid imaging and memory change for prediction of cognitive impairment

Study

Year

Radiotracer

Samplea

Number of subjectsa

Mean age (SD)

Method

Findings

Okello et al. [24]

2009

PiB

MCI

31

69.4

(7.9)

SUVR

82% PiB-positive MCI convert to AD compared to 7% of PiB-negative MCI

47% PiB-positive MCI who convert to AD within 1 year have higher PiB in anterior cingulate and frontal cortex (P < 0.05), APOE ε4 is associated with faster conversion rates in PiB-positive MCI (P < 0.05)

Wolk et al. [25]

2009

PiB

MCI

26 (23 with follow-up)

70.2

(8.8)

DVR

38% PiB-positive MCI but no PiB- convert to AD over 22 months

Morris et al. [45]

2009

PiB

CN

159

71.5

(8.6)

BP

Higher PiB retention predicts progression from CDR 0 to MCI (hazard ratio = 2.74) and AD (hazard ratio = 4.85) over mean 2.4 years

Koivunen et al. [44]

2008

PiB

aMCI

15

71.1

(7.2)

SUVR,

DVR

Elevated PiB in six converters in posterior cingulate and frontal cortex as well as elevated neocortical score

Forsberg et al. [23]

2008

PiB

MCI

21

63.3

(7.8)

SUVR

Higher PiB retention in frontal, parietal, and temporal cortices (P < 0.01) in MCI converters than CN individuals Higher PiB retention in posterior cingulate gyrus in MCI converters than MCI nonconverters (P < 0.01) No difference in PiB retention between MCI converters and AD

Small et al. [20]

2006

[18F]FDDNP

AD, MCI, CN

4 MCI,

8 CN

NA for this

subset

DVR

Three disease progressors had increases in [18F]FDDNP between 5.5% to 11.2% compared to ≤3% in nine non-progressors

  1. aIn some cases a study subsample. AD, Alzheimer's disease; aMCI, amnestic MCI; APOE, Apolipoprotein E; BP, binding potential; CN, cognitively normal; DVR, distribution volume ratio; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NA, not available; PiB, [11C]Pittsburgh Compound-B; SD, standard deviation; SUVR, standard uptake value ratio.